Log in
Econ

Enterprises are indispensable to productivity improvement

Low productivity of Vietnam is being discussed recently. The head of Vietnam Productivity Institute Nguyen Anh Tuan said, it is part of the responsibility of the employee, however, the main reason is from the enterprises.

The head of Vietnam Productivity Institute Nguyen Anh Tuan.
The head of Vietnam Productivity Institute Nguyen Anh Tuan.
A study conducted by the Vietnam Institute for Economic and Policy Research showed that, the increase rate of productivity in Vietnam is lower than the increase rate of average wage with 4.4% and 5.8% respectively. Why is there a significant difference between those two?

We adjust the minimum wage to ensure the living condition for employees. As such, the overall efficiency of the society is not high. The story about wage is that employees must have sufficient means for living. However, the problems lie at the low productivity of Vietnam. In addition to the responsibility of employee, employer has also bear the responsibility. It means, for a long time, enterprises do not pay attention to improve productivity. Despite enterprises do not want to increase wage, but in long term, it will put pressure on enterprises to use employees efficiently and improve productivity. It is a waste of time to discuss the wage is low or high, as such, employees and employers should find the solution to the common goal, which is to increase wage and productivity.

What is the productivity of Vietnam compared with neighbor countries?

At present, productivity of Vietnam is lower than high productivity countries such as Singapore, Japan, Korea from 10 – 15 times. However, in compare with our competitors such as Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, it may be a concern for us. Despite the increasing rate of productivity of these countries is the same as Vietnam, but in the coming time, the gap between productivity of Vietnam and other countries may be widen. For lower productivity countries such as Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar, the gap is being narrowed. The problem of increasing productivity in Vietnam has been discussed for many times, however we do not have efficient solutions to solve this problem.

In order to improve productivity in industrial revolution 4.0, there are opinions that enterprises should invest in robot?

This should be their decisions whether purchasing robot will bring efficiency or not. There are works robot can do, but others will require the intelligences and flexibility of human. For Vietnam, improving productivity but at it is essential to create jobs for employees at the same time. It would be meaningless to increase productivity but with a high rate of unemployment. I think, the process of industrial revolution 4.0 application in Vietnam must be gradual.

For small and medium enterprises (SME), what is the solution to increase productivity in the coming time?

Many enterprises have weak production organization, if it is not the majority. If enterprises do not reorganize production and remove obsolete technologies, productivity can increase from 15-20%, if not more. For SME, the first thing to do is to innovate organization and production to ensure efficiency. Second, it is necessary to focus on research to innovate production, in turn choose products with high value. If enterprises do not care for investment, production will stay the same.

According to regulation, since January 1 2018, social insurance payment will be based on income. This causes concern for a lot of enterprises as expenses increase, what do you think about this?

At first, it will be difficult for enterprises and employees. However, in long term, paying social insurance based on income will bring benefits for employees. As such, enterprises want to protect employee’s rights and want them to stay at the enterprises must accept this.

Thank you!
Reactions:
Share:
Trending
Most Viewed
Real estate firms sell bonds worth $402 million in May

Real estate firms sell bonds worth $402 million in May

Real estate companies have raised $862 million from bond issuance in April and May, thanks to an improved business environment and better access to funding.

Vietnam unveils new strategies to boost domestic market, aid businesses

Vietnam unveils new strategies to boost domestic market, aid businesses

As global trade uncertainties grow, Vietnam sees the domestic market not only as a key consumption driver but also a “lifeline” for businesses hit by protectionist export barriers.

Vietnam eyes US tilapia export boost as global supply falls

Vietnam eyes US tilapia export boost as global supply falls

Vietnam aims to increase tilapia output to 400,000 tons by 2030, making it the second-largest freshwater export species after pangasius.

Vietnam’s enterprises must act fast to weather US tariff shock: Experts 

Vietnam’s enterprises must act fast to weather US tariff shock: Experts 

Many of the key Vietnamese exports, such as wood products, electronics, and textiles, that are not on the US exclusion list could face steep tariffs.

Vietnam's mobile money pilot program extended to end of 2025

Vietnam's mobile money pilot program extended to end of 2025

Mobile Money, launched by the Ministry of Science and Technology, differs from e-wallets by linking users’ payment accounts directly to mobile phone numbers.

Vietnam taps innovation, global ties to elevate national brand

Vietnam taps innovation, global ties to elevate national brand

Vietnam is intensifying efforts to enhance its national brand, leveraging innovation, global partnerships, and strategic policies to bolster its global competitiveness and market presence.

Vietnam extends US$3.9 billion loan package for agro-forestry-fisheries

Vietnam extends US$3.9 billion loan package for agro-forestry-fisheries

The government has expanded the scope and scale of the credit program for the sectors which brought about US$62.4 billion worth of exports in 2024.

Vietnamese public shows rising satisfaction in 2024 PAPI survey

Vietnamese public shows rising satisfaction in 2024 PAPI survey

The 2024 PAPI survey found increasing citizen satisfaction with governance, but highlighted persistent administrative challenges, climate vulnerability, and gaps in access to public services.