May 23, 2023 | 07:00:00 GMT+7 | Weather 26°
Follow us:
70th anniversary of Hanoi's Liberation Day Vietnam - Asia 2023 Smart City Summit Hanoi celebrates 15 years of administrative boundary adjustment 12th Vietnam-France decentrialized cooperation conference 31st Sea Games - Vietnam 2021 Covid-19 Pandemic
Oct 20, 2020 / 10:58

Lack of credit culture poses risks to Vietnam bond market: ADB

A credible domestic rating agency is a critical missing jigsaw piece in the orderly development of a healthy sustainable bond market in Vietnam, stated the ADB.

The lack of a credit culture poses significant risks to the bond market and the financial sector in Vietnam, particularly as individual investors currently own almost a fourth of all bond issue, according to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)'s latest report.

With a nominal GDP at the end of 2019 at US$262 billion, Vietnam is ASEAN’s sixth largest economy and the region’s fastest growing economy. During 2019 and into 2020, the trade war between the US and China accelerated the shift of manufacturing activity from China to Vietnam and other ASEAN member states. Domestic consumption, driven by higher employment and a growing middle-class population, has supported the strong growth of Vietnam’s economy during this period.


Relative to other Asian countries, Vietnam has been the least impacted by the coronavirus disease. Despite the expected short-term decline in economic growth in 2020, the economy of Vietnam is expected to return to its growth trajectory in 2021 and stay on this path as the region’s fastest growing economy, stated the ADB.


In this context, the Vietnam corporate bond market has grown rapidly since 2017 and issuances of US$12.8 billion in 2019 were larger than those for Indonesia and the Philippines. Private placements accounted for 94% of corporate bond issuances in 2018 and 2019 following easing of disclosure requirements and issuance conditions.


Necessity for domestic rating agency

Nevertheless, a lack of demand for credit ratings in the past has been the limiting factor for a domestic credit rating agency in Vietnam. Two domestic rating agencies have been licensed by the Ministry of Finance (the first in 2017 and the second in March 2020), but they are yet to become operational.


Additionally, the absence of a credible domestic rating agency was a consistent pain point for investors and intermediaries. The rapid increase in private placements and the large exposure of retail, and perhaps unsophisticated, investors is also a cause for concern.

The recently passed 2019 Securities Law requires some public bond issues (but not private placements) to be rated by a domestic rating agency effective January 2021. Further, draft regulations that guide the implementation of the new Securities Law require few, if any, bond issues to be rated unlike other ASEAN markets that mandated credit ratings for public—and often private—offerings during their formative years, noted the ADB.


According to the ADB, Vietnam’s policy makers are keen to see an orderly growth of a healthy bond market and have expressed a strong commitment for a domestic credit rating agency.

The growth in the corporate bond market since 2017 is sustainable and the business case for a global rating agency to enter the Vietnamese market through a technical service agreement is compelling, while a technical service agreement would provide a low-risk entry.

The country’s market participants would prefer to see a collaboration of local institutions with a global rating agency. This would lead to an ideal blend of global best practices with a local understanding of culture, businesses, and practices.

Ratings depend foremost on credibility, urged the ADB, adding if an international rating agency were to partner with a domestic agency, the international rating agency’s reputation, corporate governance systems, rating methodologies, and default and loss data could decisively elevate the credibility of the domestic agency. As a result, this would lead to greater market acceptance and usage of the domestic rating agency’s ratings.

The more these bonds are rated—either through changes in the credit culture or regulations—the clearer the case will be for an international rating agency to go beyond a technical agreement and invest equity in either one of the established or a new domestic credit rating agency.